I just finished the movie ‘Religulous’ by Bill Maher, and I realized the guy has a point. Religion of any kind is illogical. It is. Think about it. Take any religion and break it down to its most basic premise; I’ll do the first one for you. (Yes, it’s probably the one you’d jump to first, too.)
Christianity: A guy who is also his son and a third thing that’s genderless got a girl pregnant without touching her and wants you to telepathically acknowledge his three-in-oneness so that you can join him in the sky when he blows everything up at the end of time. Which might be tomorrow.
Yeah, it’s easy, and it’s the first religion that everybody goes to. There are a lot of holes in Christianity, and most of them come from the disparity between the different books of the Bible and the sermons preached from modern day pulpits. Sin. Wrong-doing. Morality. The modern Christian church in America (and I want to specify America, as Christianity doesn’t have the hold on the rest of the world that it has here) has a monopoly, seemingly, on telling people how awful they are. It’s so easy to make fun of these beliefs, because thanks to recent interest by Hollywood and the publishing world, we all know about the aforementioned holes.
But, what about other religions? Let’s cut to the chase and talk about Paganism. Or, is that paganism?
Paganism: A bunch of people that don’t want to consider themselves part of anything that can’t decide what exactly they believe, but they’re pretty sure it has something to do with magic and multiple deities, unless you don’t think it has anything to do with magic and deities, then it has a lot to do with sitting in a bookstore arguing about why your beliefs are right and Christianity – specifically – is bad, while simultaneously arguing how you’re 100% accepting of everyone… Wait…aren’t we supposed to be worshipping something?
Yep, pagans, there are tons of holes in our own ‘religion.’ They begin from the fact that nobody really knows, or can categorically define, paganism. Who are the Gods/Goddesses we believe in? Why can’t we agree on them? What about the Goddess, is she better than the God? And the list goes on…and on…and on…
I’m an academic. I’m not a philosopher, and though I made A’s in all my Philosophy courses in school, I cannot possibly consider myself a true philosopher. I’m a social scientist. I study the human condition, specifically what happens when we do harm to one another. I’m what philosophers would call a naïve realist. A naïve realist is someone who completely accepts that the world is real, that it does not require perception to be real, and that it would be real whether or not I thought it was real. To me, that is a leap of faith in and of itself. I don’t question the realness of the bullet; I just know I don’t want it to hit me.
I know doubt on an intimate level. I question everything: motives, definitions, reasoning, thought patterns, what I read, what I see, and most especially what I hear out of people’s mouths. I’m the first to encourage pagans to call one another out on their claims of superpowers and claiming ridiculous titles like High Mugwump Magus of the 7th Seely Court – or whatever your particular World of Warcraft guild calls you. So, why, then would I ever talk about having faith? And how is the acceptance of reality a leap of faith?
Second question first: it’s a leap of faith because it’s much easier to continue questioning everything, but at some point you have to stop and say, “This is where I shall beginning leaning on faith.” The point where you decide that to not believe is more ridiculous than believing, that’s where you begin to have faith. I believe firmly in gravity, because not believing is ridiculous. That’s something real and measurable. It’s easy to believe in gravity, and you have to start somewhere.
But let’s jump to the big questions. God(dess). Any God(dess). How in the hell do you believe in a divine force that you can’t go visit in person or smell when they haven’t showered in a while, who can do anything and be anybody, and who made absolutely everything but can’t seem to get rid of things like disease, natural disasters, hunger, rape, gang violence, or gravity. (Hey, I’d like to fly… Leave me alone.)
For some this is answered by simply not believing. It’s really easy to not believe, because there are so many holes in a belief in God(dess). For others, it might start with one little thing: a request, a wish, a need, something that came true. Sometimes it’s a faith placed in deity, because it makes more sense than the randomness that mere science seems to suggest.
Atheism: A whole bunch of absolutely nothing suddenly exploded and rearranged its former nothingness into everything by beating the absurdly mountainous odds against it and transformed into self-replicating molecules that suddenly became stuff. And nobody else had anything to do with it whatsoever. Yep…totally random.
The funny thing is that everybody has a leap of faith about something. I believe that I will be safe and the other cars are going to stop when the light turns red. I believe that my locked door will deter burglars. Naïve, yes, but it’s real, it’s measurable, it’s trustworthy.
My doubt reinforces my faith. The more questions I ask, the more I find that while dogma might be utter crap, the idea of God(dess), the notion of magical and mental power, and the sacredness of nature makes sense. It makes more sense to me to believe in these things than to not, and it’s because of my doubt and constant questioning that my faith is constantly becoming even stronger.
Why are things done the way they are? Why do certain individuals not provide complete answers? How were things made? How come science leans on the statistical randomness of things? And, again, these questions go on and on and on. It’s easy to pick apart a particular faith, a set of beliefs and dogmas. It’s unbelievably easy to pick apart religion, because with religion comes things we must consider hard truths. If you’re a Wiccan, then you absolutely believe there are only two deities. Once you make a claim like that about something you cannot prove, you’re allowing the opportunity for others to pick it apart. When you legislate morality through religion – as is apparent in many of the world’s major religions – you’re setting yourself up for failure, because at the end of the day you cannot answer why something is wrong. Because, when a religion tells you what is right and what is wrong, the best answer you can respond to the question of ‘Why?’ is, “Because that’s what God(dess) said.” That’s not an answer.
However, at some point, there’s an acceptance of faith. It’s because of those ‘Why?’ questions that we either do or do not become believers, but I firmly believe that a healthy amount of doubt is required before we can commit to believing in anything.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Doubt, Skepticism, and Faith
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Episode 15: Inciting An Academic Riot
Episode 15 of Inciting A Riot: the Podcast. This is my apology to you listeners who have had to listen to recent shows that merely showcased my opinion and not any new or challenging research. In that light I'm presenting two research articles that I've written for both our sociology segment and our spirituality segment. Make sure to keep your thinking caps securely fastened, because we're hitting the ground running.
News: Supreme Court ruling on big business' ability to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns and the California Supreme Court case that may define paganism as a 'second-tier' religion in America.
Word of the Day: collude
Sociology: Part 1 of 5 - Stating the problem of childhood sexuality and intolerance as it relates to education by parents and the school system.
Spirituality: The Cult of Mary and the evolution of Mary as the Goddess. (I know you'll love this one.)
Thanks go out to Chris Orapello of the Infinite and the Beyond for using my promo in a recent show. Vote for all your favorite podcasts at Podcast Alley, subscribe through iTunes, and make sure to follow the blog! Links below.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
--
Podbean: http://FireLyte.podbean.com
Podcast Alley: http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=86829
iTunes: http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=337689333
Blog: http://Fire-Lyte.blogspot.com
RSS Feed: http://FireLyte.podbean.com/feed
News: Supreme Court ruling on big business' ability to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns and the California Supreme Court case that may define paganism as a 'second-tier' religion in America.
Word of the Day: collude
Sociology: Part 1 of 5 - Stating the problem of childhood sexuality and intolerance as it relates to education by parents and the school system.
Spirituality: The Cult of Mary and the evolution of Mary as the Goddess. (I know you'll love this one.)
Thanks go out to Chris Orapello of the Infinite and the Beyond for using my promo in a recent show. Vote for all your favorite podcasts at Podcast Alley, subscribe through iTunes, and make sure to follow the blog! Links below.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
--
Podbean: http://FireLyte.podbean.com
Podcast Alley: http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=86829
iTunes: http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=337689333
Blog: http://Fire-Lyte.blogspot.com
RSS Feed: http://FireLyte.podbean.com/feed
Labels:
Affairs of State,
Controversy,
News,
Podcast,
Religion/Politics,
Shout outs,
Sociology 101,
Spirit Talk
| Your Thoughts? |
Friday, January 29, 2010
Happy Anniversary to Me! (and gays and laws and news oh my!)
Exactly one year ago today I decided to start sharing my most humble opinions with the world via blogging, and thus the media outlets of Inciting A Riot with Fire Lyte were born. Since then, it's been a whirlwind year of Witch Vox articles, creating a podcast, and the steadfast articles here on the blog.
You readers and listeners have been so gracious with me, allowing me to have a voice in your daily lives. I thoroughly enjoy interacting with you, and I cannot thank you enough for your constant support.
Here's to one more year of the Riot! To kick it off right, let's get to some great news headlines.
In other news: The geniuses over at the Superbowl have reportedly denied a gay dating site from airing a commercial during their show. CBS, who is airing the country's most expensive commercials, claimed that all the spots were full, while a spokesman for the website claimed that was bogus:
You know what... It's the Superbowl. Testosteronefest. I'm not going to fault CBS for this one, whether or not they're lying about having enough spots. It is most definitely not the audience for that. Maybe they should look at getting their commercial aired during the Oscars? I put the commercial below for your giggling pleasure. It's pretty tame, but definitely would disgust the Superbowl audience.
In paganish news: I'll talk about this more on the blog tomorrow, but the Wild Hunt reported ACTUAL NEWS (surprising, no?) today when Jason blogged about a Supreme Court case in California that might possibly legally turn paganism and other smaller religions in 'second-tier' religions. This would legally allow institutions to discriminate against people of those faiths by disallowing them access to their religious materials, rituals, and clergy. I encourage you to check out the article and let me know what you think.
Email me via IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com or leave a comment below.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
You readers and listeners have been so gracious with me, allowing me to have a voice in your daily lives. I thoroughly enjoy interacting with you, and I cannot thank you enough for your constant support.
Here's to one more year of the Riot! To kick it off right, let's get to some great news headlines.
In other news: The geniuses over at the Superbowl have reportedly denied a gay dating site from airing a commercial during their show. CBS, who is airing the country's most expensive commercials, claimed that all the spots were full, while a spokesman for the website claimed that was bogus:
It's clearly a form of discrimination that we're getting the runaround, that we're not being told the truth. Quite frankly, there is a lot of ad space available -- a lot of the companies that typically advertise during the Super Bowl are not advertising this year.
You know what... It's the Superbowl. Testosteronefest. I'm not going to fault CBS for this one, whether or not they're lying about having enough spots. It is most definitely not the audience for that. Maybe they should look at getting their commercial aired during the Oscars? I put the commercial below for your giggling pleasure. It's pretty tame, but definitely would disgust the Superbowl audience.
In paganish news: I'll talk about this more on the blog tomorrow, but the Wild Hunt reported ACTUAL NEWS (surprising, no?) today when Jason blogged about a Supreme Court case in California that might possibly legally turn paganism and other smaller religions in 'second-tier' religions. This would legally allow institutions to discriminate against people of those faiths by disallowing them access to their religious materials, rituals, and clergy. I encourage you to check out the article and let me know what you think.
Email me via IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com or leave a comment below.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Labels:
Controversy,
GLBT,
Religion/Politics,
Too Funny
| Your Thoughts? |
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Mr. Obama, I'm waiting...
I'm not in the military. However, I'm defended by it. I pay taxes to support it. I really love the military, our soldiers, and the service they provide our nation. I am utterly confused, then, as to how in 2010 we still are hunting for gay soldiers in the military.
Thousands of men and women have been kicked out of the military (around 13,000) due to this ridiculous policy. Bottom line: if a person - despite their gender, race, age, color, creed, national origin, sexual orientation, or identity - wants to sign up to defend the country they live in, they should be allowed to do so. Period.
Time after time we've heard politicians claim they'll be the one to lead the fight against DADT. However, it's been upheld 5 times before the Supreme Court, and they further ruled that college campuses must be forced to allow military recruiters on the premises despite their views of discrimination, which many colleges are against. Funny thing about all this is that around %75 of all Americans (including 66% of CONSERVATIVES!!!) have no problem whatsoever with gays serving in the military, so sayeth a 2008 poll.
So, last night, when President Obama said that this year would be the year he ends Don't Ask Don't Tell, I think I might be the only gay guy to be highly underwhelmed. In my email inbox this morning was an urgent message from the HRC telling me to get out the word and the vote and all the other stuff in order to get this thing gone. But, this same guy ran partly on the platform that he would end Don't Ask Don't Tell with the flick of a pen and allow gays the same civil rights as straight people - whether that will be called marriage, though, is still up in the air.
It's been over a year since we elected the guy, and there hasn't been a swish of a pen. I don't get it. So, will this be the year where we get some headway in equal rights? He did sign into law the Matthew Shepard act. If any President was going to do this, it would be him. However, if we're still wondering when the guy will get on civil liberties in 2011, I'm sorry, but I'll be looking for a new body to fill the seat.
Oh, Mrs. Clinton? Still feel like being President?
If you haven't seen the entire speech, you can download it through iTunes by clicking here. Or, you can see it below from YouTube.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Thousands of men and women have been kicked out of the military (around 13,000) due to this ridiculous policy. Bottom line: if a person - despite their gender, race, age, color, creed, national origin, sexual orientation, or identity - wants to sign up to defend the country they live in, they should be allowed to do so. Period.
Time after time we've heard politicians claim they'll be the one to lead the fight against DADT. However, it's been upheld 5 times before the Supreme Court, and they further ruled that college campuses must be forced to allow military recruiters on the premises despite their views of discrimination, which many colleges are against. Funny thing about all this is that around %75 of all Americans (including 66% of CONSERVATIVES!!!) have no problem whatsoever with gays serving in the military, so sayeth a 2008 poll.
So, last night, when President Obama said that this year would be the year he ends Don't Ask Don't Tell, I think I might be the only gay guy to be highly underwhelmed. In my email inbox this morning was an urgent message from the HRC telling me to get out the word and the vote and all the other stuff in order to get this thing gone. But, this same guy ran partly on the platform that he would end Don't Ask Don't Tell with the flick of a pen and allow gays the same civil rights as straight people - whether that will be called marriage, though, is still up in the air.
It's been over a year since we elected the guy, and there hasn't been a swish of a pen. I don't get it. So, will this be the year where we get some headway in equal rights? He did sign into law the Matthew Shepard act. If any President was going to do this, it would be him. However, if we're still wondering when the guy will get on civil liberties in 2011, I'm sorry, but I'll be looking for a new body to fill the seat.
Oh, Mrs. Clinton? Still feel like being President?
If you haven't seen the entire speech, you can download it through iTunes by clicking here. Or, you can see it below from YouTube.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Labels:
Affairs of State,
Controversy,
GLBT,
News,
Sociology 101
| Your Thoughts? |
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Teen Baby Bumps Make A Comeback
For the past decade teen pregnancy has been on either a plateau or a decline, depending on which set of information you subscribe to. Either way, this is considered a good thing. Less teen pregnancies lead to less unwanted or unexpected children from children that can lead to a whole load of good things for teens - like the ability to attend college or succeed in their career without the burden of children. Those bright, shiny times are past. And, I don't like to toot my own horn - okay, that's a lie - but I told you so.
It was reported today by nearly every media outlet that for the first time in 10 years teen pregnancy is on the rise. I'd have to go back and listen, but I believe Lacy and I talked about the steady increase and plateau of teen pregnancy that began back around 2004 or 2005, which many attribute to the strict implementation of abstinence programs in place of sex education. That's where Planned Parenthood, according to a prepared statement, is placing the blame:
Though, abstinence has its strong points, it should not be the only form of birth control that is taught. My senior thesis for Criminal Justice/Social Sciences centered around early sexualization of children and teens. A large portion of my research dealt with the kinds of sex education that schools provide, granted it was in Texas (which gets the title of the state with the most teen pregnancies). In many schools that teach abstinence only sex education (oxymoronic if you ask me), the textbooks do not even mention the words 'condom' or 'contraceptive.' Instead, they recommend that before engaging in a mixed-gender social activity the juvenile should take a nap, among other genius ideas.
Studies also prove categorically that children want the information about sex, and that they know we're keeping it from them. Numbers also tell us that the majority of parents feel their children should learn sex education and contraception. These same statistics, though, lament that the majority of parents that want this education for their children do not give it themselves, nor do they want schools to give it. So, we're raising a generation of children that have no proper idea of how to put a condom on, whether they should be taking the pill, what are the options should they either get pregnant or get someone else pregnant, and what an STD is and how one could contract it.
And, POOF, a rise in teen pregnancy. Now, statistics are also saying the rise could be due to a disparity between the explosion of lower-class and minority teen pregnancies. This is also quite true, because in areas where low-income families live, schools tend not to have the funding to promote proper sex education. Indeed, many times sex education classes are traded off for other courses considered more vital. Or, as the Guttmacher report puts it, this increase may be due to several issues including "shifts in racial and ethnic composition of the population, increased in poverty, the growth of abstinence-only sex education programs at the expense of comprehensive programs, and changes in public perception and attitudes toward both teenage and unintended pregnancy."
Either way you slice it, teen pregnancy is back in a big way. I've heard from people of earth-centric faiths that they teach their children that sex is a wonderful thing, nothing to be ashamed of doing, but I rarely hear about respecting yourself enough to use protection. If we do not arm our children with the knowledge and skills they need before their hormones get the best of them - AND THEY WILL - then we are just as much to blame for what happens as they are. Moreso, in my opinion.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
It was reported today by nearly every media outlet that for the first time in 10 years teen pregnancy is on the rise. I'd have to go back and listen, but I believe Lacy and I talked about the steady increase and plateau of teen pregnancy that began back around 2004 or 2005, which many attribute to the strict implementation of abstinence programs in place of sex education. That's where Planned Parenthood, according to a prepared statement, is placing the blame:
It is a tragedy that after a decade of progress in reducing the rate of teenage pregnancy we are witnessing a substantial increase in the number of teens who are getting pregnant.
Though, abstinence has its strong points, it should not be the only form of birth control that is taught. My senior thesis for Criminal Justice/Social Sciences centered around early sexualization of children and teens. A large portion of my research dealt with the kinds of sex education that schools provide, granted it was in Texas (which gets the title of the state with the most teen pregnancies). In many schools that teach abstinence only sex education (oxymoronic if you ask me), the textbooks do not even mention the words 'condom' or 'contraceptive.' Instead, they recommend that before engaging in a mixed-gender social activity the juvenile should take a nap, among other genius ideas.
Studies also prove categorically that children want the information about sex, and that they know we're keeping it from them. Numbers also tell us that the majority of parents feel their children should learn sex education and contraception. These same statistics, though, lament that the majority of parents that want this education for their children do not give it themselves, nor do they want schools to give it. So, we're raising a generation of children that have no proper idea of how to put a condom on, whether they should be taking the pill, what are the options should they either get pregnant or get someone else pregnant, and what an STD is and how one could contract it.
And, POOF, a rise in teen pregnancy. Now, statistics are also saying the rise could be due to a disparity between the explosion of lower-class and minority teen pregnancies. This is also quite true, because in areas where low-income families live, schools tend not to have the funding to promote proper sex education. Indeed, many times sex education classes are traded off for other courses considered more vital. Or, as the Guttmacher report puts it, this increase may be due to several issues including "shifts in racial and ethnic composition of the population, increased in poverty, the growth of abstinence-only sex education programs at the expense of comprehensive programs, and changes in public perception and attitudes toward both teenage and unintended pregnancy."
Either way you slice it, teen pregnancy is back in a big way. I've heard from people of earth-centric faiths that they teach their children that sex is a wonderful thing, nothing to be ashamed of doing, but I rarely hear about respecting yourself enough to use protection. If we do not arm our children with the knowledge and skills they need before their hormones get the best of them - AND THEY WILL - then we are just as much to blame for what happens as they are. Moreso, in my opinion.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Labels:
Controversy,
Kid Matters,
News,
Sociology 101
| Your Thoughts? |
Monday, January 25, 2010
Changing to Become Yourself
If you're into celebrity gossip (and I'm not...at all, but just saying if you are...) then you've heard about Heidi Montag and Bristol Palin. Recently, these girls have gotten 10 plastic surgeries in one day and vowed to re-virginize herself until marriage, respectively. Each of them has done what they've done, because they say they want to stay true to who they are, either to become more comfortable in their skin or to become closer to their moral core.
Let's look at Ms. Montag. This is what she looked like before:
The girl was pretty. Was she a supermodel? No, not by any means. But, less than 1% of the population looks like a supermodel, and even those that are supermodels still get airbrushed. Meaning: nobody on the face of the planet looks like a supermodel in a magazine after photoshop and airbrushing gets through with them. Heidi, a tabloid and MTV reality show fixture, claims that her severe insecurity led her to first get a nose job and then proceeded to get 10 plastic surgeries in one day (which is considered by many medical professionals as unethical since it requires a patient to be under anesthesia for far more hours than is healthy). Montag claims that she's been picking out surgeries for the last 3 years and claims she's 'beyond obsessed' with plastic surgery.
The surgeries she received are: buttocks augmentation, boob job touch-up (she'd had a previous boob job), nose job touch-up (also had a previous one), chin reduction, liposuction in her neck, liposuction in her waist and thighs, mini brow lift, botox in the forehead, fat injections in her cheek and lips, and pinning back her ears. This combination of surgeries turned this girl from the above picture to this:

It's just disgusting and pathetic that a 23-year-old girl had ruined her body, turning it into a human barbie doll. Whether this girl has actual self-esteem issues, or if she's just pandering to the media - which wouldn't surprised anyone - she is setting somewhat of an example about the normalization of the impossible image and young girl's desperate seeking of that image. If nothing else, this should be a reminder to us that the images we airbrush and photoshop effect young people in a very real way.
Depression, eating disorders, suicide attempts, and various other body dysmorphic disorders can result from these feelings, and the idea that we must change our outside to become more of who we are... Well, that's a bit silly isn't it? You can change your nose to look different, but don't say it's because you're trying to feel more like yourself.
And to Bristol Palin, no I hadn't forgotten about her. Recently, she said this on Oprah:
I'm not going to have sex until marriage, and I can guarantee it. Bristol Palin is now out there preaching abstinence, which is proven not only ineffective education, but leaves children unprepared when the situation actually arises... So to speak. I cannot say this enough. Children need to be taught the facts about sex. They need to understand that it is not a bad thing; it is a biological thing. It is a pleasurable thing, but it can also cause very real, very adult consequences. Sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy are the most obvious, but the psychological ramifications of early sexualization can lead to later criminality, depression, and other very adult emotions.
If we take the cookie away from the kid and only provide the reason that they're not allowed to have the cookie - not providing a 'Why?" response - then they're just going to want the cookie more. Give them the information, the options, and hope that you taught them well enough to wrap it before they tap it.
The idea that we need to change, to swear things, to pledge abstinence after already giving birth to a child, to have 12 plastic surgeries before your 24th birthday, to stare at magazine covers in covetous libidinousness, to do any or all of these things - or more - in order to become more yourself... That's ridiculous.
Let me know what you think by emailing IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Let's look at Ms. Montag. This is what she looked like before:
The surgeries she received are: buttocks augmentation, boob job touch-up (she'd had a previous boob job), nose job touch-up (also had a previous one), chin reduction, liposuction in her neck, liposuction in her waist and thighs, mini brow lift, botox in the forehead, fat injections in her cheek and lips, and pinning back her ears. This combination of surgeries turned this girl from the above picture to this:

Depression, eating disorders, suicide attempts, and various other body dysmorphic disorders can result from these feelings, and the idea that we must change our outside to become more of who we are... Well, that's a bit silly isn't it? You can change your nose to look different, but don't say it's because you're trying to feel more like yourself.
And to Bristol Palin, no I hadn't forgotten about her. Recently, she said this on Oprah:
I'm not going to have sex until marriage, and I can guarantee it. Bristol Palin is now out there preaching abstinence, which is proven not only ineffective education, but leaves children unprepared when the situation actually arises... So to speak. I cannot say this enough. Children need to be taught the facts about sex. They need to understand that it is not a bad thing; it is a biological thing. It is a pleasurable thing, but it can also cause very real, very adult consequences. Sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy are the most obvious, but the psychological ramifications of early sexualization can lead to later criminality, depression, and other very adult emotions.
If we take the cookie away from the kid and only provide the reason that they're not allowed to have the cookie - not providing a 'Why?" response - then they're just going to want the cookie more. Give them the information, the options, and hope that you taught them well enough to wrap it before they tap it.
Yes, I just said wrap it before you tap it.
The idea that we need to change, to swear things, to pledge abstinence after already giving birth to a child, to have 12 plastic surgeries before your 24th birthday, to stare at magazine covers in covetous libidinousness, to do any or all of these things - or more - in order to become more yourself... That's ridiculous.
Let me know what you think by emailing IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Labels:
Controversy,
Gripe Department,
Soapboxes,
Sociology 101
| Your Thoughts? |
Sunday, January 24, 2010
This came out of me today
So, I got the compulsion to write again, but this one's short. Given the readership here, I thought a few of you might get something out of it.
There's no title. Just a poem. Written today.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
The little lies we tell
are the truths that keep us from
Stark Raving Mad's city limits.
The madder, the crazier, we become
the more we avoid becoming worse.
Because while we take midnight
trips away from Sanity,
eyes must close and blink open
and
Accept.
There's no title. Just a poem. Written today.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
The little lies we tell
are the truths that keep us from
Stark Raving Mad's city limits.
The madder, the crazier, we become
the more we avoid becoming worse.
Because while we take midnight
trips away from Sanity,
eyes must close and blink open
and
Accept.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Commercializing Blackness
The picture I posted two days ago came from Wal Mart. Yes, I shop at the evil empire - have you seen their low, low prices? I walked in the front doors and was greeted by this cardboard sign advertising Black History Month.
And, I wonder if anybody is as pissed off by the sign as I am. In the last year, I've seen retail stores begin advertising Christmas in June, Halloween in August, Thanksgiving in September, and Valentine's Day last December. We're pushing holidays earlier and earlier, and I think it's not going to stop until retail is as bad as the current political climate - constantly pushing all holidays all the time, despite how far away it is.
But this... I'm all for celebrating black history month, and I don't mind businesses and other establishments encouraging the populace to embrace diversity and such, but what is this sign saying? Is it saying, "Hey, we should look back at the great things black men and women have done for humanity and use that to better overcome racial tensions and stereotypes."? Or does it say, "Hey, black history month is coming up, you should celebrate it by buying stuff from black people."?
I go with the latter. To me, this sign is subtly pushing a racist ideology that's sprung up in the last few decades. This sign focuses on the color of the author's, singer's, and movie maker's skin color rather than whether they are actually contributing to real history. I'm a fan of Beyonce, but how is me buying a cd from her 'celebrating black history month?' No, really, I'd like to know how.
To expand the point a bit, how is buying anything ever a way to celebrate anything? Will the idea of Valentine's Day disappear if you don't indulge in the commercialization of the day? What about Halloween, Earth Day, or New Year's Eve? Do those days not happen or become, somehow, less if we don't buy products manufactures specifically for those days?
To digress, I'd rather Wal Mart just post up a sign of Tubman, Douglas, Parks, Obama, or any one of the hundreds of black men and women who have contributed to our American way of life in a positive, real way. It's not like they need the money, and it's not like any of those products wouldn't sell without Wal Mart reminding us that the people making them are black. Celebrate the historical reminders and social encouragements that the month could bring. But, don't use it as any excuse to buy stuff just because someone is black.
You shouldn't do anything for or against someone based solely on their race. It's preposterous and defeats the whole notion of equality. Share your thoughts on commercializing Black History Month by leaving a comment or emailing IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
PS My article Hip Hop Rosaries and What Not to Wear is number one on Witch Vox this week! Also, next week they'll be publishing The Burning of Margaret Murray. I encourage you to check it out tomorrow!
And, I wonder if anybody is as pissed off by the sign as I am. In the last year, I've seen retail stores begin advertising Christmas in June, Halloween in August, Thanksgiving in September, and Valentine's Day last December. We're pushing holidays earlier and earlier, and I think it's not going to stop until retail is as bad as the current political climate - constantly pushing all holidays all the time, despite how far away it is.
But this... I'm all for celebrating black history month, and I don't mind businesses and other establishments encouraging the populace to embrace diversity and such, but what is this sign saying? Is it saying, "Hey, we should look back at the great things black men and women have done for humanity and use that to better overcome racial tensions and stereotypes."? Or does it say, "Hey, black history month is coming up, you should celebrate it by buying stuff from black people."?
I go with the latter. To me, this sign is subtly pushing a racist ideology that's sprung up in the last few decades. This sign focuses on the color of the author's, singer's, and movie maker's skin color rather than whether they are actually contributing to real history. I'm a fan of Beyonce, but how is me buying a cd from her 'celebrating black history month?' No, really, I'd like to know how.
To expand the point a bit, how is buying anything ever a way to celebrate anything? Will the idea of Valentine's Day disappear if you don't indulge in the commercialization of the day? What about Halloween, Earth Day, or New Year's Eve? Do those days not happen or become, somehow, less if we don't buy products manufactures specifically for those days?
To digress, I'd rather Wal Mart just post up a sign of Tubman, Douglas, Parks, Obama, or any one of the hundreds of black men and women who have contributed to our American way of life in a positive, real way. It's not like they need the money, and it's not like any of those products wouldn't sell without Wal Mart reminding us that the people making them are black. Celebrate the historical reminders and social encouragements that the month could bring. But, don't use it as any excuse to buy stuff just because someone is black.
You shouldn't do anything for or against someone based solely on their race. It's preposterous and defeats the whole notion of equality. Share your thoughts on commercializing Black History Month by leaving a comment or emailing IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
PS My article Hip Hop Rosaries and What Not to Wear is number one on Witch Vox this week! Also, next week they'll be publishing The Burning of Margaret Murray. I encourage you to check it out tomorrow!
Labels:
Controversy,
Soapboxes,
Sociology 101,
WitchVox Articles
| Your Thoughts? |
The Riot Library
Here you'll find a list of books I love, books I own, books I've recommended, and books you absolutely must know about. This isn't your typical pagan library, as Inciting A Riot isn't your typical pagan blog/podcast. It's actually rather New Age bookstore filler-lite, as in there's not much listed that you'll find in the New Age section of your bookstore. Rather, as I tell you all constantly, I believe your spiritual worldview should be formed from information and literature in all genres.
So browse around! You might find something you like!
Note: I do own all of these books. I would never recommend something that I do not personally enjoy.
The Inciting A Riot Official Book Club
Ok, these books are most likely repeats of books you'll find later on down the list. BUT, these books are probably what you came here to find. Each of these has been an official Inciting A Riot Book Club selection. Each has been reviewed and/or discussed on the blog and podcast. Join the Literary Riot and get yours today!
Spiritual Oxygen
These aren't the typical pagan texts. In fact, many of these books will completely contradict what you'd find in the New Age section of your bookstore or witchy shop. Despite this, these books have helped to shape my own spiritual path. Some are fiction, some are not, but all are utterly essential to your library.
Fiction
These are the fictional books that don't quite fit into another category. Each is phenomenal in its own right. Some are verging on fantasy or sci-fi, others delve into the inner workings of man, but none of them fully commit to any of those genres.
Non-Fiction
These books are just good ol' fashioned good reading. They're non-fiction books that entertain, inspire, and showcase someone that definitely incited their own riot.
Fantasy
Every good library needs a dose of fantasy - both high and low. Whether it's sword and sorcery or intricately woven high fantasy, you'll find a little bit of everything here. And, yes, this will be the fastest growing section, as I can't live without a good dose of fictional magic for long.
Mythology
Here are some of my favorite tales of myth, folklore, and legend. Some of these books should be bought for the art in them alone, while others are classics of literature, and still more are just plain good fun. Don't worry. This is one of those sections that will rapidly expand as I dig through old boxes. And, because you'll ask, I've included modern mythology as well in the form of comics.
Sociology
These are textbooks, nonfiction books, and other resources that I've purchased that I frequently use for research. I have more that are packed away in boxes somewhere, but these are the ones that have made it to the bookshelf.
Poetry
Though this list doesn't necessarily represent all of my favorite poets, it does represent my personal poetry collection. Books that - for whatever reason - spoke to me in a way that I just had to own them.
The New Age Section
Ok, these books are most likely repeats of books you'll find later on down the list. BUT, these books are probably what you came here to find. Each of these has been an official Inciting A Riot Book Club selection. Each has been reviewed and/or discussed on the blog and podcast. Join the Literary Riot and get yours today!
Spiritual Oxygen
These aren't the typical pagan texts. In fact, many of these books will completely contradict what you'd find in the New Age section of your bookstore or witchy shop. Despite this, these books have helped to shape my own spiritual path. Some are fiction, some are not, but all are utterly essential to your library.
Fiction
These are the fictional books that don't quite fit into another category. Each is phenomenal in its own right. Some are verging on fantasy or sci-fi, others delve into the inner workings of man, but none of them fully commit to any of those genres.
Non-Fiction
These books are just good ol' fashioned good reading. They're non-fiction books that entertain, inspire, and showcase someone that definitely incited their own riot.
Fantasy
Every good library needs a dose of fantasy - both high and low. Whether it's sword and sorcery or intricately woven high fantasy, you'll find a little bit of everything here. And, yes, this will be the fastest growing section, as I can't live without a good dose of fictional magic for long.
Mythology
Here are some of my favorite tales of myth, folklore, and legend. Some of these books should be bought for the art in them alone, while others are classics of literature, and still more are just plain good fun. Don't worry. This is one of those sections that will rapidly expand as I dig through old boxes. And, because you'll ask, I've included modern mythology as well in the form of comics.
Sociology
These are textbooks, nonfiction books, and other resources that I've purchased that I frequently use for research. I have more that are packed away in boxes somewhere, but these are the ones that have made it to the bookshelf.
Poetry
Though this list doesn't necessarily represent all of my favorite poets, it does represent my personal poetry collection. Books that - for whatever reason - spoke to me in a way that I just had to own them.
The New Age Section
This is the very small section of books I actually own that come from the New Age section of the bookstore. You'll notice they're all mostly spell books, as I tend to only use these for inspiration when creating my own rituals or spells. Nothing from these books is ever used as it appears in-text, rather, I tweak everything to make it personal and unique to the situation.
Friday, January 22, 2010
One Up on Receipt Guy
New poem. I hope you like it. Sorry about the last three days of absence; I've just been exhausted. Working 7 days a week is about the least fun one can do. Also, I want you all to email me your guesses about what is wrong with the picture I put up earlier... Let me know what you think! IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com. My thoughts will come tomorrow and may either make you think, disgust you, elicit a giggle, or all of the above. But, then again, it wouldn't be the Riot without that, now would it.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
One Up on Receipt Guy
I don’t feel I dress poorly or
glance furtively right and left
while restraining a bulbous overcoat.
I do not smell – okay maybe I do,
but it’s expensive stink – either from the gym or bottle.
All things equal and considered then,
Sir, I am quite curious to know your reason
for ‘randomly’ stopping me of all the people
exiting that particular supermarket at that particular time
for a supposedly random cavity search of my receipt.
Yeah, Receipt Guy, I knew you didn’t check the
ticket of the couple in front of me.
And those folks meandering to the sides and back?
They apparently passed your most astute mental filter.
Me, though, I got the look, the hand wave, the
‘Can I see your ticket…?’
as you eyed my box of Gain laundry detergent.
Minutes… Not seconds, but minutes passed as you
crinkled the paper of my receipt in your hands
your hands that seem to know how to lean onto
the bars of partial barrier between the exit way and the Subway.
Finally, you give me the look again and say
I don’t see the Gain on here. You need to pay for the Gain.
Sir, I paid for it. The guy scanned it and sat it on top of the
grocery bag carousel.
Well, you’re going to have to show me, because it’s not on your receipt.
Ok…I’m thinking…I’ll do that.
I look. I look some more.
I don’t know which code of numbers and letters equals
detergent. I know exactly which douche bag won’t let me leave,
but I cannot for the life of me find the damn Gain.
So, now, in the absence of the word GAIN somewhere on
my receipt that’s better encoded than an Illuminati address book
I’ve got to do the walk of shame and theft to the back of the
express lane and pay for the damn Gain all over again.
Great, now the nosy little ladies at the checkout stand
think the receipt guy’s a hero for catching that smelly, well-dressed
kid before he made off with the Gain!
The rest of the groceries were paid for, but that Gain…
Weighing my options between jail time for beating
Receipt Guy over the head with the detergent box
and waiting in the ungodly long line – again
I decided no judge would convict me, but right as I raise my
righteous hand to deliver supermarket justice, I see it.
It’s there. On the ticket. The Gain.
The Damn Gain!
It’s on the ticket, and it says I paid $10.97 for it!
I shove the ticket in the guy’s face, and revel in the fact
that I – the college graduate with the important job and title –
have beaten the supermarket Receipt Checker Guy.
Score one for humanity.
Then I think how pathetic it is that I’m mentally competing
with the high school drop out who goes to his kid’s
Career Day and tells the class that his occupational goal
is to one day upgrade from a pencil
to a highligher.
Labels:
Follow Ups,
Poetry,
Ramble On
| Your Thoughts? |
Monday, January 18, 2010
Episode 14: Inciting A Gay Riot
Episode 14 of Inciting A Riot: the Podcast. Oh yes, I'm talking about the topic of being a gay pagan today. You've all been asking the questions, and today I'm providing some answers about those funny gay folks and how they fit into a fertility religion that seems obsessed with penises, vaginas, and how one fits into the other.
The word of the day is noetic.
The poems (yep, there're two!) are 'GOD HATES YOU' and 'After a Fall.'
The news articles have to do with gay marriage becoming legalized in Mexico and Portugal, as well as the ongoing issue of Prop 8 and gay marriage in California.
I also play a bit of music from Sinead O'Connor. The song is Thank You For Hearing Me, and it can be purchased on iTunes. Like I did. Legally. If anybody asks...
Donate to the Haiti Relief Fund by calling 1 800 REDCROSS or by texting Haiti to 90999 - which will donate $10 to the Redcross for relief efforts in Haiti.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
PS Rioters, during editing the beginning of a couple of words got cut off. I hope you don't hate me. Podcasting is a learning experience!
--
Podbean: http://FireLyte.podbean.com
Podcast Alley: http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=86829
iTunes: http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=337689333
Blog: http://Fire-Lyte.blogspot.com
RSS Feed: http://FireLyte.podbean.com/feed
The word of the day is noetic.
The poems (yep, there're two!) are 'GOD HATES YOU' and 'After a Fall.'
The news articles have to do with gay marriage becoming legalized in Mexico and Portugal, as well as the ongoing issue of Prop 8 and gay marriage in California.
I also play a bit of music from Sinead O'Connor. The song is Thank You For Hearing Me, and it can be purchased on iTunes. Like I did. Legally. If anybody asks...
Donate to the Haiti Relief Fund by calling 1 800 REDCROSS or by texting Haiti to 90999 - which will donate $10 to the Redcross for relief efforts in Haiti.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
PS Rioters, during editing the beginning of a couple of words got cut off. I hope you don't hate me. Podcasting is a learning experience!
--
Podbean: http://FireLyte.podbean.com
Podcast Alley: http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=86829
iTunes: http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=337689333
Blog: http://Fire-Lyte.blogspot.com
RSS Feed: http://FireLyte.podbean.com/feed
Labels:
GLBT,
Music Yum Yum,
News,
Podcast,
Poetry,
Slamtastic,
Spirit Talk
| Your Thoughts? |
Sunday, January 17, 2010
The Gays and Paganism
I have actually been trying to write an article about being a gay pagan for a few months now. Toying with ideas and themes, I couldn’t ever quite find what angle I felt best described the nature of being both gay and pagan and how it affected my life. And the more I thought about it, the more confused I became, which should be rather odd, because I am both of those things: gay and pagan.
The most obvious place to begin, I thought, was – as with most things dealing with modern paganism – Gerald Gardner. The founder of Wicca fused several different types of magical practice and religious philosophies to create a religion that worshipped a Goddess and her consort, the God. It has been stated by many that Gardner detested gay people, as being gay goes against the natural order of things. Lois Bourne, one of the High Priestesses of the Bricket Wood coven stated:
Gerald was homophobic. He had a deep hatred and detestation of homosexuality, which he regarded as a disgusting perversion and a flagrant transgression of natural law....'There are no homosexual witches, and it is not possible to be a homosexual and a witch' Gerald almost shouted. No one argued with him.
However, there are some that say his views of homosexuality softened as he got older, and either way it goes, Gardner’s creation eventually evolved into being one of the most gender-inclusive religions on the planet. As more priests and priestesses took the reigns, and as more covens have been created, books written, and younger generations become involved, Wicca has become accepting of all people despite their color, creed, orientation, gender identity, ethnicity, or shoe size.
Despite this, there is still the problem of deity. Wicca is set up as a true fertility religion, in the sense of human fertility. There is a male God who is always male, and a female Goddess who is always female. They copulate and create everything. How is a gay man or woman to identify with this great union of divine forces? How am I to relate to the Goddess and God in the sense of fertility, which is the heart of earth-worship?
I found I could answer these questions rather simply: I’m not Wiccan. Nope. Never have been, and most likely never will be. I don’t have anything against the religion, but it just doesn’t seem to suit me. Though, I do like the idea of the duality of the divine. It seems to fit. For everything in the world there is both an equal and opposite thing. For matter, there is anti-matter. Life, death, love, and heartache. Everything has a pair, and I believe this to be the case with deity. But, as I’ve said in the past, it doesn’t mean that the God and Goddess are wholly male or female, or even the opposite at the same time.
Being non-Wiccan, I don’t view the holy twosome as a divine penis and a divine vagina. They’re not just fertility and copulation, though they bring those things about as well. They are the epitome of duality, and as is the true nature of duality, both must be both at some point. So one part of divinity is male and the other is female for fertility, but They might both be female at some point or male or neither. The problem with the anthropomorphism of the Divine is that they are not human. It’s easier for us to assign them human characteristics, such as gender, because that’s what we are, and we think God(dess) should be just like us.
But, even if the God and Goddess are male and female all the time, it wouldn’t be difficult for me to relate to them. I took 7th grade science. I am fully aware that the guy’s swimmers run up the rabbit hole to find the Cadbury egg. I get it. When a man and a woman really love each other, or have too much tequila, 9 months later a stork flies in on Dumbo and drops a baby down the chimney. Or…something like that. It takes absolutely nothing away from the act of Divine Creation if I do not fertilize an egg myself. I can create in a myriad different ways.
I can paint and write and sculpt and create loving relationships and make fantastic meals and every spring I can plant seeds and every fall I can reap a harvest. Believe me, I can create just as well as any high school quarterback and head cheerleader in the back of a ’97 Ford. Creation of a human child is just one method of creation.
To look at the idea on an even more superficial level, when I am asked a question such as, “What’s it like being a gay pagan?” or “How does being gay affect your spiritual practice?” I suppose I could be asked the same thing about being blonde. “So, does being really tall make it easier to see the Goddess because you’re closer to Heaven, or harder because you’re farther from the earth?” Being gay is just a characteristic. It’s the huge nose on my face that’s been there since I was born and will be there on my deathbed. It’s a part of me I’ve never questioned, though I may not have wanted it at times.
And as for the deeper spiritual practices, sometimes called the Mysteries, those don’t bother me either. Sure, I may not get to go through all the stages of the mysteries, but I’m not really sure everyone always gets to go through every single stage. And, again, it doesn’t take anything away from the Feminine Mysteries because half the population can’t know them, and vice versa for the Masculine Mysteries. They are both equally adequate for teaching and learning, and utterly inadequate as we attempt to label an infinitely complex dichotomy.
So, to answer the question out there – should you find yourself on either end of it – being a gay pagan has its drawbacks and its perks. For one thing, I most likely won’t be involved in the fertility rites in a physical manner, which is great because I wouldn’t know what to do anyways. On the other hand, I don’t have to go to classes or workshops to learn the ‘mysteries’ of men or women. I’ve got the absolute best of both worlds! I’m already a guy, and I have enough girl friends that I’m already privy to the inner workings of that dark, dangerous place we call the female mind. But, best of all, my over-the-top pagan jewelry and garb can be guaranteed to be better than yours. It is. Don’t fight it. The gays have the dressing good thing down to a science.
Love and Lyte,
Fire Lyte
Labels:
GLBT,
Spirit Talk
| Your Thoughts? |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










