Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Care to Spread Some Empathy?

Em・pa・thy (n) -
  1. the imaginative projection of a subjective state into an object so that the object appears to be infused with it.
  2. the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner; also : the capacity for this.
Empathy is colloquially thought of as the ability to see from another's point of view, to understand what it is they are feeling. Empathy is the great equalizer of mankind. Or, at least, it should be. 

Empathy, however, is something I think we are on the verge of losing as a whole. 

How often do we see the leaders of this country's government, of our various religions, of our various group of choice point a finger or cast judgment on another group? It is a severe lack of empathy that causes this judgment, and it has been tearing not just our overall country, but our communities and social groups apart. 

Recently, I had the extreme displeasure to hear someone deride one group of people for their perceived reaction to a tragedy. The reaction of group B was compared with person A's reaction, which was, of course, a better reaction. When I hear people attempting to weigh out tragedy and one's reaction to tragedy, further deciding whether it is acceptable to react in one way or another due to said tragedy, I am disgusted. That's like asking, "What's worse: racism or homophobia?"

Is it better to be robbed and beaten or be bullied at school your entire life?

Is it better to avenge an injustice or turn the other cheek?

It is not our place to compare suffering and decide which is worse, because pain is pain, whether you believe it to be or not. 

When I was very young, my paternal great-grandfather gave me a contraption that held marbles. It was basically a jar attached to a wooden gumball machine-type base. You pulled the little handle out, and your marbles came out one by one. After he died, that jar was placed on my bookshelf in a place of honor. One night my parents had hired a babysitter to watch me - remember I was maybe 8 or 9 - and she knocked over the jar by accident. I was inconsolable. I cried for hours, the kind of crying that comes from a deep, guttural place, turning your face purple and pulsing out the veins on your temples. 

Looking back, I'm not sure why I had gotten so terribly upset. I didn't know the man very well, except for a few very nice things he'd done for me that I still remember. But something about the way in which the babysitter just could not understand why I was upset and why she needed to understand she had done something wrong, which she didn't. She thought she'd broken a glass jar that held marbles, and that it would all be ok if she could clean it up and stick the marbles in another container. 

It's never about the marbles, though, is it?

There was an emotion there that had been tied up in the giving of the gift, and of the loss of a loved one, and of wanting to keep that object whole... 

If two houses are destroyed, one by fire and the other by flood, one loss is no greater than the other. The owner of the burned house cannot look at the owner of the flooded house and say, "You're complaining too much. At least your house is still standing. Mine has burned to the ground." There is no comparison in tragedy. 

I'm not saying one should not attempt to move on with their lives, to heal and to better. But, the healing and the betterment cannot be on your scale or timeframe, especially if you have nothing to do with the situation. Have you never had someone close to you murdered? Well, can you relate by keying in on a time you have felt a profound sense of loss? You may not have experienced the inability to find a suitable job for months or years, but you have probably had your own bouts of bad luck. 

Some of the most powerful magic you can do is to let someone else know that they are not alone. That what they are feeling is not wrong, and that you will support them. Spread some empathy around, and next time, dear Rioter, that someone is complaining a little too loudly for you about their own tragedy, try and find a human connection with them.

In case you're wondering, I never did replace the broken glass jar.

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Book Review: The Magicians by Lev Grossman

The Gods of the Bargain Bin smiled upon me this summer. I had been reading some heady books on the education system - which will be reviewed on the show at some point - and about various sociology topics, and I finally had to say, "Me need fantasy. Me need brain break."

My inner Grog, the Caveman, was coming out big time. 


I walked into Borders - before they went belly up - and found The Magicians by Lev Grossman in hardback on their bargain shelf for $5. After reading the words "Harry Potter for adults" on dozens of reviews online (ain't smart phones grand?), I paid for it gladly.

Let me first say that this is Harry Potter for adults only in the sense that there is a boy who goes to a school for magic. If I were to be a bit more honest, the school - Brakebills - resembles Hogwarts about as much as I resemble Brad Pitt. In a very, very good way. (Not me, the school.) The school reminded me of the wizard's school in the Earthsea novels by Ursula K. Le Guin much more than Hogwarts, as the magic is hard to do. It is a combination of often painful hand gestures, learning and perfecting of dozens of languages, and the magic is overall really hard to do. In fact, they say multiple times that there are some who go to the school (that only lets in 20 students per year, making it more exclusive than any institution on the planet) who never really get the hang of magic.

Just like the Le Guin series, the protagonist - Quentin - is a damaged boy. Despite the learning of magic and gaining of love and friendship, he remains pretty damaged. The wave of a wand and the touch of a magic school doesn't quite remove the stain of his internal struggle, and it makes him all the more human. Though, to be fair, there are a few occasions where the author's insistence on making him so fallible is unnecessary and irritating.

Something you should know about the story is that, unlike his compatriots of the genre, Grossman begins this series with Quentin being 18. Brakebills is a college, not a prep school. As such, he goes through many of the things that sheltered, nerdy kids go through in college: sexual discovery, getting a mildly jaded view of life far too early, etc. So, yes, there is sex. There is sex by humans, sex by humans that have been turned into animals, boy/boy sex, boy/girl sex, sexy sex, inappropriate sex, and sometimes sex because the author seemed to want to throw a sex scene in the book. Now, it's not graphic, but he does mention it quite a lot in the last half of the book.

The book borrows heavily from Harry Potter, Le Guin, (other magic school-based, coming-of-age novels), and The Chronicles of Narnia. In fact, there were a number of scenes and characters that were quite literally ripped out of the pages of those books - sometimes to a point where I was wondering if he would be sued for copyright infringement. (Seriously, he should have just called it Narnia instead of Fillory. It was the Same. Damn. Place. Aslan isn't a lion; he's a ram. That is the only difference.)

The Magicians is well written. Grossman knows his stuff, but he should, given that he is a professional book critic. In interviews he has readily admitted pretty much stealing some ideas (the cacodemon on the character's backs comes to mind), but the story is original in its own right. I have a fairly broad vocabulary, but this guy made me happy I had the Merriam-Webster app on my phone. His use of language is so verdant, and it made me love the novel all the more.

Putting it all together (my 5 Torch Breakdown):

  • Technicals - The book easily gets a torch for technicalities. It is well-written with plenty of high-level ideas, though it is still accessible. But, you might want to keep a dictionary handy. If you're reading it on the Kindle, you'll be using that built-in function quite a bit.
  • Obtuse/Obscure - It gets about 3/4 of a torch here. The book isn't hard to read or anything, but by incorporating too many plot points from too many other, dare I say better (perhaps more beloved?), stories, it can get over-broad at times.
  • Characters - I would almost give this torch double the weight, but that's not fair. The characters are rich, and you come to know even the most minor of characters. With merely a paragraph, sometimes, of backstory, Grossman's lush text paints an exceptionally vivid picture of every person in the book. They're people, flaws and all. Admittedly, perhaps it is easy to identify with them because I've already read all about them. The protagonist is a Ged/Harry hybrid. The love interest is quite easily Hermione with straight hair. Etc. 
  • Memorable - I'm torn here. It's fun. It's fast. You'll really enjoy reading it. You might even recommend it to all your friends, but is it going to become a beloved, memorable read for you? The ending leaves a bit to be desired. There were at least 3 times when I was thinking, "Ok, bucko, I saw the last Lord of the Rings movie, too, and we all know that there comes a point when you just need to END IT!" It's very fun, but I'm not sure I would re-read it. Though, I might take the audio book on a road trip! 1/4 of a torch.
  • Story - Half a torch, and that's being generous. Again, I'm torn, because it is a lot of fun. And, for those of us looking for the next fantasy addiction, this will fill that void beautifully. But, it's been done. It's Harry Potter for Narnia Fans. It's Narnia for Harry Potter Fans.  It's this combination of the two with sex scenes stuck in it to remind us that it's for adults. I'm hoping that now that he has this one out of his system, the second book in the series - The Magician King - allows Grossman to stand on his own two worlds and create something unique.
That's 3 1/2 torches for The Magicians by Lev Grossman. Click the link and grab it from Amazon for less than $4. The sequel is out already, and I plan on reading it just as soon as I finish the book I'm currently loving. 

The book in 1 short sentence: The Magicians is a fun, sexy, hedonistic mash-up of Harry Potter and Narnia that will be great, if not familiar, fun on a long weekend or anytime you want a magical brain massage.

Have YOU read The Magicians by Lev Grossman? Are you GOING TO?!

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Monday, August 29, 2011

Episode 58: Inciting An Agnostic Riot

Episode 58 of Inciting A Riot: the Podcast brings on two of Fire Lyte's new favorite podcasters for an interview about being an agnostic. Ross and Carrie - of Oh No! Ross and Carrie! - are two atheist/skeptics that go investigate spiritual claims so you don't have to.

Or, you know, so they say.

You can check out their website at OhNoPodcast.com and send them an email at Info@OhNoPodcast.com.

Please continue to vote for the show on Podcast Alley. Vote, subscribe to, and rate the show on iTunes. Join the TwitterRiot by following me @IncitingARiot. Enter the Swag Contest through a donation on PayPal or purchase of swag through the CafePress.com swag shop. Check out my art on FireLyte.Etsy.com. Send any and all feedback to IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com!

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Home Page: http://www.IncitingARiot.com
Podcast Alley: http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=86829
Etsy: http://FireLyte.Etsy.com
iTunes: http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=337689333
Twitter: http://twitter.com/IncitingARiot
Swag Shop: http://cafepress.com/IncitingARiot
Project Pagan Enough: http://www.incitingariot.com/p/project-pagan-enough.html

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Lucifer (New Poem)

Lucifer

Would I have done it differently?

Faced with commands and little masters
undeserving.
Is it different from the Underground Railroad?
Told to serve.
Given masters and told they're better.

I would run, at least, want to run.
I know I'd talk about it. Fantasize
about it.
Freedom: the Great Wet Dream.

If told I was the first draft
relegated to adoring the final product,
told what my place would be

whether I liked it or not,

if told I had no option, for there
had never been an option

I can imagine turning around,
closing my eyes, sticking my
middle finger in the air

and
       fall.

Except, since it's biblical, we call it

Fall.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Swag Updates & A New Draw!

Congratulations are in order for Alisa Sternfield! She is the winner of the first leg of our Summer Guilty Pleasure Giveaway! For her marvelous double entry, she wins a copy of the new bestseller Spellbound by Kelley Armstrong!


Alisa, that book will be shipping out today! Thank you for keeping the Riot running!

Now to the new Swag Draw! The next selection in our Summer Guilty Pleasure Series is The Last Four Things by Paul Hoffman. A military fantasy that mixes farce, black humor, and action that follows the events of Hoffman's wildly popular novel The Left Hand of God.


So, if you want to win, you can enter in one (or all) of a few ways:

  • Make a donation to the show. One of the ways I say 'thank you' to those generous Rioters whose donations keep the Riot running is with an automatic entry into all Swag contests. Donations of any amount can be made via the PayPal Donate button.
  • Buy something. With a purchase of any item in either the CafePress.com Swag Shop or my new Etsy Shop, you also get an automatic entry! Just remember to let me know about your purchase! 
  • Send in your Top 10 Guilty Pleasures List. Your top 10 books, movies, pagan authors, anything! What are YOUR guilty pleasures? Email them to IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com for an entry!
  • Rate the show. Rating the show on iTunes is a great way to increase visibility for new listeners! Head over to iTunes and turn some of that love for the Riot into some stars! (How about 5?) Let me know you rated the show for another entry!
  • Record a spoof! Ok... For all of you who like to comment about how easy it should be to do a podcast, and for those of you who come down hard on podcasters when they don't put out shows on an hourly basis, I have a challenge. Take 1 of my segments on the show and spoof me. Make it a good spoof, too. Like, if you think you're funny, but nobody else thinks you're funny, and you still want the Kelley Armstrong book, just find an extra $1 somewhere and donate that. I want good audio, good editing, and high value spoofage. If I get at least 2-3 spoof clips, they will go on the show in a contest of their own and the winner will get a big, fat prize. So, take my Sociology segment where I get preachy, my Spirituality segment where I get pretentious, my news segment where I can't shut up, my Word of the Day where I act far too intelligent (and shame myself at pronouncing Latin), my Gripe Department, my Feedback, my Poetry (Oh I can't wait to hear these...), my Tips & Tricks... Any of them! Pick your favorite and do a spoof. I ask that they be over 1 minute in length, and try and trim it down to about 5 minutes. (Unlike what I do on the real show.) 
Remember, you get one entry for everything you do! (Up to 5 entries!) The swag draw will run until mid-September, so get those entries in fast!

Oh...did I forget to mention?

There will be TWO winners in this Swag Draw! Yep, I have TWO hardback copies of Paul Hoffman's The Last Four Things to give away! Your chances are better than ever!

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Episode 57: Inciting A Separate Riot

Episode 57: Inciting A Separate Riot takes a look at the reality of the Separation of Church and State.

News:

  • Debt crisis 
  • 82% of Americans disapprove of Congress 
  • Credit rating downgrade/stock market drop 
  • Warren Jeffs 
  • Couple foreclosed on Bank of America 
  • Cosmo for men app 
  • Iowa straw poll 
  • Chocoholic fish 


WOTD: defenestration

Mrs. Oddly Commercial

Gripe Dept: Pizza ordering etiquette

Spirituality: How much separation do we really want between church and state?

Music: A Voice that Carries - Bonnie McKee

Sociology: The importance of responsible pet care with my favorite guest of all time! Guess who!

Please continue to vote for the show on Podcast Alley. Vote, subscribe to, and rate the show on iTunes. Join the TwitterRiot by following me @IncitingARiot. Enter the Swag Contest through a donation on PayPal or purchase of swag through the CafePress.com swag shop. Check out my art on FireLyte.Etsy.com. Send any and all feedback to IncitingARiotPodcast@gmail.com!

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Home Page: http://www.IncitingARiot.com
Podcast Alley: http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=86829
Etsy: http://FireLyte.Etsy.com
iTunes: http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=337689333
Twitter: http://twitter.com/IncitingARiot
Swag Shop: http://cafepress.com/IncitingARiot
Project Pagan Enough: http://www.incitingariot.com/p/project-pagan-enough.html

What Stephen Colbert can teach YOU.

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Colbert Super PAC - Persuadulux 6000
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogVideo Archive

On last night's episode of the Colbert Report, the host - Stephen Colbert - had a little demonstration. He has this thing called the Colbert Super PAC (Political Action Committee), a real political action committee that is really approved by the FEC (Federal Election Commission) to run political ads. Why does he, a cable comedy news host, have said PAC?

Some quick legalese for you: In 1976 there was a case heard by the Supreme Court - Buckley v. Valeo - in which the court said that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. In other words Money = Speech. Also, it was found that candidates can give unlimited amounts of money to their own campaigns. However, at the time, there were a few spending limitations put on candidates. They couldn't receive certain amounts of money from businesses or the ultra-wealthy. This case has been hotly contested, but recently a new ruling by the Supreme Court has expanded what was found in '76.

If you'll recall, last year I covered a story in which the Supreme Court heard the case of Citizens United (a PAC) v. Federal Election Commission. The court found that, to put it succinctly, there is no cap on the limit of money a corporation or individual can donate to a Political Action Committee. Combine that with the fact that a PAC does not have to disclose its donors to the public, and you basically have the ability for billionaires, millionaires, and the largest companies in the world to funnel money into a political action committee that can then be used to garner support for the candidates and causes of their choice. No longer can a person with a good message and a dream get his fellow citizens to donate what money they have to his or her campaign to try and get elected, because now elections cost hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars. Who has that kind of cash? Big businesses and people with the right last name.

Back to Stephen Colbert's Super PAC. As explained in the video, he was asked what his political action committee stood for, and he then asked the people that donated to his PAC what they wanted it to stand for. He put the most used words in a word cloud - the more often the word was used, the bigger the words appears. Words like Marijuana, Freedom, People, Fair, and Giving were among the larger words. But, then he did something else. He said ok...let's say $1 equals 1 vote. The people that donated $100 obviously get 100x more votes than the guy that donates $1. Then the cloud changed. All of a sudden the largest words were Tax, Education, People, Government, Health, Reform. The ideas of Freedom, Marijuana legalization, and many of the other rights and liberties people said they wanted all but disappeared.

It's a big lesson to learn.

The United States government has said that Money = Speech, and has upheld that argument since 1976, giving the people that have money more and more rights. I suppose the point is this: put your money where your mouth is. This can apply to nearly all situations we care about.

If you want your local bookstore, your local witchy shop, your local farmer's market, your favorite podcast/blog/online institution, your favorite charity, your pet social issue (things like GLBT rights or racial equality), your right to healthcare, your neighborhood park, your grandmother's nursing home, your alma mater, your [insert cause/institution/organization/business here] to thrive...

$pend.

You're going to have to spend your money. You're going to have to do more than say, 'Well that sucks,' when your local Witchy Shoppe Emporium closes its doors. You're going to have to do more than go to your local coffee shop or book store and sit in the comfy chairs tapping on your laptop, not buying anything. You're going to have to support that charity with your dollars, your cash, your hard earned moolah. Because, as we've seen recently, even the largest chains in America (Borders, Circuit City, etc.) are not immune to going under. 

We do not live in a world, anymore, where your voice is heard just by you speaking your mind. You have to spend your money, and you have to organize others to do the same. It's a lesson for any fringe group. Want to know why something like the Tea Party can organize en masse and influence elections and public policy? Because most of their organizations have become backed by very, very wealthy people. Because they've organized and spent money. 

Next time you're griping about a store closing or an organization not doing enough or whatever...ask yourself...what have YOU done about it? Have you put enough money and time into the cause to be considered a $100 donor, or are you just bitching about something and remaining at the $1 level?

The Supreme Court says Money = Speech. What have YOU said lately?

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Sunday, August 14, 2011

How I Celebrated the Full Moon

I did a little painting! I've wanted to paint the Goddess Icon in warm tones, typically reserved for the God, for some time. It is a theme I believe I will continue, as I feel it is a true joining of the two. Also, I have had the urge to paint on wood for some time. I layered a few warmer tones on this square of wood I bought, and as they dried I was quite elated to see how they had played with the natural grain of the wood.

I also love how She floats over these warm tones. They don't seem to be encroaching upon Her or enveloping Her, but rather allowing Her to be. Part of Her, as She seems to be a part of it.

I dunno. I just painted it. What do YOU think? (Of course, if you like it, click here to buy it!)

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte


Acrylic & Watercolor on Wood


Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Inciting A Disabled Transcript

As a special treat for you blog readers that do not listen to the show, Episode 55 (Inciting A Disabled Riot) has been given the transcript treatment. It was only fitting, as we discussed physical and mental disabilities on the show, that we provided a way to 'listen' to that show for those Rioters that are deaf or hard of hearing.

So, without further ado, I give you Episode 55: Inciting A Disabled Riot with special guest (almost) Dr. Sophia Catherine! (After the jump...just to save page space.)

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Monday, August 8, 2011

The Venus of Willendorf

In honor of the fact that I finally have my own Venus of Willendorf, I thought you, my dear Rioters, might enjoy a quick and dirty rundown of the history of this prolific icon.

The Venus of Willendorf, also known as the Woman of Willendorf, is an 4.3” high statuette of a female figure estimated to have been made between 24,000 and 22,000 BC. It was discovered in 1908 by archaeologist Josef Szombathy at a Paleolithic site near Willendorf, a village in Lower Austria near the city of Krems. It is carved from an oolitic limestone that is not local to the area, and tinted with red ochre.Since this figure's discovery and naming, several similar statuettes and other forms of art have been discovered. They are collectively referred to as Venus figurines, although they pre-date the mythological figure of Venus by millennia.

The apparent large size of the breasts and abdomen, and the detail
put into the vulva, have led scholars to interpret the figure as a
fertility symbol. The figure has no visible face, her head being
covered with circular horizontal bands of what might be rows of plaited hair, or a type of headdress. She was thought to be very healthy given her weight and size.

A characteristic of all the Paleolithic "Venus" figurines exhibited by the Willendorf statuette is the lack of a face, which for some, arguing that the face is a key feature in human identity, means that she is to be regarded as an anonymous sexual object rather than a person; it is her physical body and what it represents that is important. Also, it may be important to note that the original Venus cannot stand on its own, but it seems to fit perfectly in one’s hand. Thus, it is believed one should hold it rather than have it stand.

This idol’s true purpose and reason for being carved has been lost to history, and it is subject to much debate on the part of scholars around the world. Neo-Pagans revere the idol, and others like it, as symbols of The Goddess. In fact, she is revered as a symbol of The Mother Goddess, as she reflects ancient Greek and Roman depictions of mother deities who gave birth to the primordial gods. The problem with saying whether or not this carving represents a universally worshipped deity or merely a carving of a woman lies, as with much of ancient history, in the lack of knowledge one way or the other.

Either way, it must be noted that symbols transform their meanings over time, and today the Venus of Willendorf is regarded the world over as yet another face - though she is faceless - of the Goddess.


In honor of my recent purchase, my own Venus painting, She who rests on water, has been reduced to $30! This is a great time to get yourself an original painting, and to enter the new swag contest! So, hey, you could both get a piece of art AND win a book! (And, you know, it doesn't hurt that you're helping with the upcoming Podbean fees.)

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Sunday, August 7, 2011

So... This happened yesterday.

Rick Perry, the delightful man running the state of Texas as its governor, spent yesterday leading 30,000 people in prayer. The rally, called The Response, was touted by Perry as a time to pray for the country, because he doesn't have any answers to the rising job, economic, debt, (etc.) crises...so let's ask god.

He called it a non-denominational event open to all...you know...except you have to pray to the Christian god, and it's being led by about a half dozen of the most racist, bigoted zealots this nation has ever birthed. There's the guy who says Japan's economy is failing because the president had sex with a demon. The guy who said Oprah is a sign of the antiChrist. The guy who said that the Christian god sent the Nazis to kill all the Jews. And, of course, all of them hate the gays and can't wait to roast marshmallows on their burning corpses when they get to Hell. (Of course, if they can help them get down there faster, all the better.)


Some excerpts from his prayer(s) have been making the rounds in the news:

“Father, our heart breaks for America,” Perry said as he led the crowd in prayer. "We see fear in the marketplace. We see anger in the halls of government and as a nation, we have forgotten who made us, who protects us, blesses us, and that we cry out for your forgiveness.”

“Our hearts do break for those who suffer, those afflicted by the loss of loved ones, the pain of addiction, the strife that they may find at home – those who have lost jobs, who have lost their homes, people who have lost hope."

“Loving God, forgive us our many sins: for being judgmental, unloving, focused on ourselves, lacking in mercy, hypocritical,” he said. “We are sinful and flawed; use us anyway, by and for your glory and purposes that we may all live quiet and peaceful lives. We need you. America needs you. I pray this in your name.”

While I appreciate the idea of calling the nation to pray for our country, I don't like the way he is going about this. Nor do I like the manner in which he has pretty much said, "Well, I don't really have any good ideas for fixing the country. How about we pray!" And...that's nice...but it doesn't fix anything. It makes evangelical Christians feel better, and to them this is doing something. But, for those of us a little more practical, or simply not Christian, I cannot see this as anything other than pseudo-political posturing.

This reminds me of when George W. Bush won the 2004 elections and said that he now had a mandate from God. Yep, that worked out.

Rick Perry's ideas are not the kind we need in Washington. Has Obama done a 100% job of making everyone happy? No. Could anybody? Absolutely not. But, at least we're not under a theocratic form of Christianized government following the reckless mentality of saying "damned the laws, I'm doing things however I want." We have a separation of church and state in this country, and I cannot in any way see how this does not violate that separation. If you want to be a politician, then recognize that you are not a Christian preacher. And vice versa.

What do YOU think about The Response?

Update! The full video of the longest continuously serving U.S. Governor, three-term Texas politician (who likes to just ignore things like the Vienna Convention when it suits him) giving a Christian sermon is below for your viewing pleasure.

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Thursday, August 4, 2011

My Witchy Finds!

Witchy Wearables, my local witchy shop, always has incredible finds. There are so many unique lines and fun little baubles you simply cannot find anywhere else. Lughnasadh was a few days ago, and I spent part of that afternoon browsing the shelves, perusing all the goodies not there the last time I shopped. I'd like to share some of my finds with you.


This super cool witchy bottle reminded me of a bottle I received from Mrs. Oddly. It doesn't have anything in it, but it's just super cool. The artist is Eliora, and they make candles, candle sticks, goblets, votive holders, votives, and all sorts of other witchy things. I can honestly say I'll be buying a LOT more from this artist. I just need to think of something to put in there. I can honestly say, Eliora's bottles make me want to learn how to make witchy oils so I can fill them.

Confession: I cannot, for the life of me, make witchy oils. 

Another confession: I've never actually tried. I hear it's a rather expensive hobby. And...yeah...


I HAVE MY OWN VENUS OF WILLENDORF!!!!! Really, I cannot tell you how excited I was to find this piece. I'm almost positive this has been sitting there all this time, but I've just now seen it. They had these carved out of either rose quartz or this stone, which I think is red jasper. She sits on my altar, but I just love holding her in my hand. She feels comfortable and right. She might find her way into my pocket when I'm having a particularly hard time and need a little watching over. 

Do YOU have a Venus of Willendorf? 


I got this horse talisman and wrapped citrine as a present for Partner who is going to be buying and selling some horses in the near future. I'll be dedicating this talisman to Epona, and he will keep it in his truck, unless you have a better idea for its location. Citrine for business success and the horse talisman...umm...kinda self-explanatory. Anyways, I hope he finds it to be a lovely helper in his business ventures.

What witchy finds have YOU found lately? How jealous are you of mine? 

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Debt Crisis Update

Because many of you have told me that your chief - or only - source for mainstream news is this blog and my podcast, I felt it necessary to keep you updated on the ongoing debt crisis in America.

Late last night the House of Representatives passed an initiative that would raise the debt ceiling until the end of next year. Thus, this would require this same round of negotiations and posturing at the end of 2012/beginning of 2013. (A note: of course, this means that all those folks in Washington who don't want to talk about this during an election year are going to get their wish.)

What's in the deal?

  • In the first installment, $917 billion would be cut over 10 years in exchange for increasing the debt limit by $900 billion.
  • The deal will increase Pell grant funding, but cut other financial aid. Graduate and professional students will no longer be eligible for interest subsidized loans. Repayment incentives will also be done away with after July 1, 2012.
  • The agreement establishes a joint committee of Congress (that some are calling the Super Congress) that would produce debt reduction legislation by November 23, 2011 that would be immune from amendments or filibuster. The goal of the legislation is to cut at least $1.5 trillion over the coming 10 years and be passed by December 23, 2011. The committee would have 12 members, 6 from each party.
  • Projected revenue from the committee's legislation must not exceed the revenue baseline produced by current law.
  • The agreement specifies an incentive for Congress to act. If Congress fails to produce a deficit reduction bill with at least $1.2 trillion in cuts, then Congress can grant a $1.2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling but this would trigger across the board cuts ("sequestration") of spending equally split between defense and non defense programs. The across the board cuts would apply to mandatory and discretionary spending in the years 2013 to 2021 and be in an amount equal to the difference between $1.2 trillion and the amount of deficit reduction enacted from the joint committee. The sequestration mechanism is the same as the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. There are exemptions—across the board cuts would apply to Medicare, but not to Social Security, Medicaid, civil and military employee pay, or veterans.
  • Congress must vote on a Balanced Budget Amendment between October 1, 2011 and the end of the year
  • The debt ceiling may be increased an additional $1.5 trillion if either one of the following two conditions are met:
    • A balanced budget amendment is sent to the states
    • The joint committee cuts spending by a greater amount than the requested debt ceiling increase.

Ok... I can understand why nobody is really happy here. We have a little under $15 trillion in debt. Now, if you're like me, sometimes reading these words takes things out of perspective. Let me help. Our debt is this big:

$14,294,000,000,000

In fact, if you ever want to be shocked and disgusted, take a quick look at the exceptionally well-done National Debt Clock website. From there I have two numbers to show you. The amount the federal government SPENDS is $3.6 trillion (or $3,604,065,987,368. FYI, that number will have gone up by the time you check it.) The amount the federal government MAKES is $2.2 trillion.

So, we're spending more money than we make. And you say, "Yes, Fire Lyte, that's how we got into this debt crisis in the first place. That's how all people go into debt. They spend more than they make." Well, I have a question: If you spend more than you make, and you've taken out a serious chunk of debt. Let's say, comparatively speaking, you make $40k/year, and you have $100k in debt. Obviously, we all know what happens to our monthly income. $40k/year isn't take home pay. You probably take home something like $28k/year because of taxes. After that comes your rent or mortgage, your car payment(s), your food, clothing, entertainment, trips to Salem, etc. How much is left after that to pay down that debt?

What happens for people is different than what happens with governments. We can cut little by little and make a difference over time, as long as we don't add to the debt, as long as we cut up those credit cards. Governments like ours do not have the luxury of cutting up the credit cards and adding to the debt. We also do not have the luxury, as a government, of the last resort of most Americans: bankruptcy. We cannot just absolve all of our debts for a small fee and a few hours in court.

$900 billion is what the debt ceiling is being raised, which should abate the hemorrhaging in this debt crisis for a little while, but Republicans made sure we cut $917 billion in spending....over 10 years. That doesn't equal out to "more than the debt ceiling" no matter how you slice it. We have to make some very serious cuts in certain areas - like defense spending (which I would rather they call 'war spending' as having a permanent presence in dozens of countries doesn't quite feel like 'defense' to me). They also need to add revenue. Badly.

If somehow you had the opportunity to get a better job so that you were now taking home $40k instead of just $28k/year, that debt you have could disappear a lot quickly, right? Especially if you learned how to continue to survive on that $28k/year. Well, we have dozens of wars around the world combined with insane tax cuts for the wealthy. (totaling around $1.6 trillion for the top 20% and about $1.3 trillion for the wars in just Iraq and Afghanistan according to the AP)

How are these meager (by comparison) cuts spread out over 10 years actually going to affect anything? And why aren't these unbelievably wealthy politicians willing to gain that $1.6 trillion back from the wealthiest Americans by simply reverting back to pre-Bush era taxation? (you know...the Clinton years...when there was a surplus?) And why in the world is Obama constantly going on television and saying he's going to "trust" the Republicans will do the right thing when they clearly have decided against any sort of compromise on raising revenues?

The Senate votes today on this debt ceiling increase proposal, and many Republicans are doing a couple things: 1) saying the vote in the House was a victory. 2) saying they're going to vote against it.

So...exactly who is trying to...you know...make sure we're not going to default and cause the nation to eat cat food and live in caves? Neither party appears to be budging, but when there is budging from one camp, there is no show of reciprocity.

Keep your fingers crossed that we can at least get through this with our dignity.

What's that? Oh we've lost that in our political system already, you say? This bodes well...

Keep checking Twitter for the latest on the debt ceiling crisis!

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte

Monday, August 1, 2011

Blessed Lughnasadh! Harvest Thoughts.


Today is Lughnasadh, which always presents me with a mixed bag of emotions. On the one hand, it's a Sabbat. (Yeah Sabbat!) And, that's always a good time. On the other hand, there really isn't any mundane holiday to compare it to, thus making it feel a bit odd. A few points on the Wheel of the Year were never celebrated in any form before I became pagan, and they take a bit of getting used to - yes, even 10 years later.

But, Lughnasadh isn't just about the 'Is it a Sabbat, or isn't it' stuff. I know it's an important day, and, if nothing else, it helps me to increase my sense of community and belonging, because I know that pagans around the world are celebrating today as well. No, I always see Lughnasadh as the start of the three harvest festivals, a series, if you will. And, by the end of that series, things will be much cooler, and I'll be looking at another winter here in Chicago. I realize it's a few months away, yet, but the weather turns rather quickly up north, and I'm never keen on giving up the few months of warmth we're allowed.

It is a time to harvest what has been sown, and to plant your fall crops if you're able. This year, above all past, that has intense metaphorical meaning to me. In America, we are less than 24 hours - quite seriously on the precipice - from defaulting on our national debt. We are mere hours away from doing irreparable harm to our nation. Around the globe, now, there are terrible issues of social injustice, and I cannot help thinking that this is what we have sown. This is our reaping. We have become lackadaisical in our view of our fellow man, taking for granted the great gift we've been given by the mere fact of our humanity.

Sow something new today. I ask you, when doing your ritual of choice, direct that energy towards compromise, towards opening our eyes and really seeing one another. Direct that energy to those in power, and those not. Speak into existence an era of understanding, of putting aside differences and politics and civil unrest, and simply helping one another get by.

Instead of planting the same old seeds in the same salted earth and being surprised when nothing good comes up, let's choose a new crop. Let's reap a new harvest.

Blessed and Happy Lughnasadh to you and your family. May the sun shine upon you, and may you reap the biggest bushel of blessings.

Love and Lyte,

Fire Lyte